Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 2/14/25 11:28 AM, WM wrote:

On 14.02.2025 15:57, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/14/25 9:24 AM, WM wrote:

 

>
The set of useful FISONs is empty. Show the first not useless FISON.

 

Your set of "useful FISONs" doesn't have a proper definition,

 The definition is that it is a set of FISONs which has a smallest element that is not as useless as a cup of coffee.
 Regards, WN

Which, as I said, is a definition in Naive Set theory, and thus you are just admitting that you are using broken logic.
Since you use Naive Mathematics and Naive logic, that isn't surprizing, but of course, that also shows why your mathematica and logic just break when pushed too hard.
Sorry, you just proved that you are too stupid to be trusted in the field you talk about.