Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Dec 2024, 14:30:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <fa5dd2bb45e6774a4ddc0687e646f052f5a46c56@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 05 Dec 2024 17:04:58 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 05.12.2024 13:56, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 05 Dec 2024 12:42:17 +0100 schrieb WM:
But every number you can take belongs to a vanishing subset of ℕ.
What does that have to do with the ability to be "chosen"?
It is impossible to choose a number outside of a tiny subset.
Duh. There are no other numbers.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.