Mathematical simplicity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Mathematical simplicity
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 05. Apr 2025, 23:35:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <g3QwKryG1I7SnMqPePywbc0k7Ns@jntp>
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Mathematical simplicity.
Mathematics isn't always simple.
But sometimes, with a little thought, we can find very simple shortcuts, which are, however, surprisingly true.
We said that in quadratic functions f(x), for example, it was enough to change the sign of the monomial with an even exponent to obtain the point-symmetric function $ (for those who follow) called g(x).
This function g(x) has real roots if f(x) doesn't, having only two complex roots.
Now, what does [-b±sqrt(b²-4ac)]/2a become if we change the sign of a?
It becomes [-b±sqrt(b²+4ac)]/(-2a)
It's mathematical.
But that's not all, you'll remember, if you remember anything from what I said earlier: I said that the complex roots of a function are pure imaginaries, and that they are found by rotating f(x) 180° about the point $(0,y₀ ) to form g(x).
We then have here, directly, the complex roots of f(x), given in pure imaginaries, as should always be the case if we correctly understand what we are doing. Notations like x'=2+3i or x"=-3-i are a mathematical joke.
Real roots of quadratic functions: x= [-b±sqrt(b²-4ac)]/2a
Complex roots of quadratic functions:
x= {-[b±sqrt(b²+4ac)]/(2a)}.i
Beware of sign errors (the big trap of complex roots).
Example, let's set f(x)=x²+4x+5
x'=i
x"=-5i
If you replace x with i or -5i, you will get f(x)=0.
If you can't do this, it's because you haven't understood how imaginary numbers work, like 100% of the human beings on this earth.
Thank you for your attention.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Apr 25 * Mathematical simplicity10Richard Hachel
6 Apr 25 `* Re: Mathematical simplicity9Ross Finlayson
6 Apr 25  `* Re: Mathematical simplicity8efji
6 Apr 25   +- Re: Mathematical simplicity1Richard Hachel
8 Apr 25   `* Re: Mathematical simplicity6Moebius
8 Apr 25    `* Re: Mathematical simplicity5Richard Hachel
8 Apr 25     `* Re: Mathematical simplicity4FromTheRafters
8 Apr 25      +- Re: Mathematical simplicity1Richard Hachel
8 Apr 25      `* Re: Mathematical simplicity (redux)2Ross Finlayson
8 Apr 25       `- Re: Mathematical simplicity (redux)1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal