Sujet : Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Apr 2024, 07:15:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvfsa2$3g7vi$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/9/2024 3:47 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/9/2024 5:22 AM, WM wrote:
Le 09/04/2024 à 01:54, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 4/8/2024 9:55 AM, WM wrote:
Le 07/04/2024 à 21:47, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
The successor operation is closed in
the natural numbers.
>
For visible numbers only.
>
Visibleᵂᴹ or darkᵂᴹ,
k is a natural number :⟺
k=0 ∨ ∃⟦0,k⦆: ∀i ∈ ⟦0,k⦆: i⁺¹ ∈ ⦅0,k⟧
>
Not correct if there are all natural numbers such that no further one exists below ω. Multiplication by 2 creates numbers beyond ω, or there would be numbers immune to multiplication.
moron.
Are you the never ending story?
https://youtu.be/x1afn71-0sIlol!
Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets