Sujet : Re: how
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 23. Apr 2024, 22:23:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v098rk$1rm51$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/23/2024 12:13 PM, WM wrote:
Le 23/04/2024 à 20:57, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM was thinking very hard :
Le 22/04/2024 à 20:02, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM has brought this to us :
Le 21/04/2024 à 00:44, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM wrote :
>
What is a gap in the ordinals?
>
It is a not existing ordinal between two ordinals. It is a not existing natural number next to ω, for instance.
>
Sets do not have not existing elements.
>
What is ω - 1?
>
An absurdity.
>
Not more nor less than ω.
>
What is the value of ω?
It cannot be expressed in units as a finite initial segment of ℕ.
So, you were always missing your largest natural number from the get go? You are a moron? WM, sure seems to think that there _is_ a largest natural number, he just cannot see it, so, well, it must be dark. lol! Your largest natural number is already in the set of all natural numbers!
Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
Re: how