Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 07. Jul 2024, 21:28:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6etov$f604$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/7/2024 1:27 PM, WM wrote:
Le 07/07/2024 à 22:25, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
On 7/7/2024 1:19 PM, WM wrote:
Le 05/07/2024 à 19:09, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 7/5/2024 3:53 AM, WM wrote:
>
But uncountability could only be established by completed infinite sequences, not by finite formulas.
>
Uncountability has been established for {y:N₁→10:¬∃0…}
It has been, historically.
It has been, here, for you (WM).
It could be established again, for you,
>
It is impossible to completely write an infinite digit sequence.
An infinite digit sequence cannot be determined by writing all its terms.
An infinite digit sequence can only be determined by a finite expression.
There are only countably many finite expression.
>
What generated this?
>
.(121232)
>
?
The finite formula ".(121232)" generated this.
Did you know that a rational generated it?
…