Re: Does the number of nines increase?

Am 12.07.2024 um 19:29 schrieb WM:
 > Le 10/07/2024 à 19:58, Jim Burns a écrit :
 >> On 7/10/2024 12:02 PM, WM wrote:
 >> When you say that
 >> NUF(x) doesn't changeᵂᴹ at 0
 >> you mean that
 >
 > it does not change its value from x < 0, namely NUF(0) = 0.
But it changes its value from aleph_0 for each and every x > 0 to 0 at x = 0, Du dummer Depp!
 >> your argument depends upon it being unclear what you (WM) mean.
In der Tat, Du hirnloser Affe.
 > That <bla bla bla>
Geh scheißen, Mückenheim!