Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Jul 2024, 16:27:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v70qpr$6n41$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 14.07.2024 um 17:04 schrieb Moebius:
Am 14.07.2024 um 14:58 schrieb WM:
Le 13/07/2024 à 21:37, Moebius a écrit :
Am 13.07.2024 um 17:56 schrieb WM:
Le 13/07/2024 à 04:38, Moebius a écrit :
Am 12.07.2024 um 19:29 schrieb WM:
> Le 10/07/2024 à 19:58, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
>> When you say that
>> NUF(x) doesn't changeᵂᴹ at 0
>> you mean that
>
> it does not change its value from x < 0, namely NUF(0) = 0.
>
But it changes its value from aleph_0 for each and every x > 0 to 0 at x = 0,
>
That claim is wrong,
>
Nope.
>
That claim is wrong,
Nope.
Hinweis:
For each and every x e IR, x > 0: NUF(x) = aleph_0
and for each and every x e IR, x <= 0: NUF(x) = 0.
That's a change, isn't it?
…