Sujet : Re: More complex numbers than reals?
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Jul 2024, 16:47:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v70ru5$6n41$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 14.07.2024 um 15:09 schrieb WM:
Le 14/07/2024 à 03:30, Ben Bacarisse a écrit :
the "surprising" result of WMaths that E in P and P \ {E} = P
The "surprising" result of Ben Bacarisse's math: card({a, b, c}) = 3, even for a = b = c.
The "surprising" result of FromTheRafters's math: From Ex(x = {a, b, c}) we can conclude that a =/= b, a =/= c and b =/= c. (Actually, {6, 3+3} contains zwo elements, namely 6 and 3+3. Hence card({6, 3+3}) = 2.)
Names/Terms in these new math approaches have magical power!