Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 15. Jul 2024, 22:57:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v745vl$skrg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 15.07.2024 um 15:33 schrieb joes:
Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:21:52 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 14/07/2024 à 17:04, Moebius a écrit :
Am 14.07.2024 um 14:58 schrieb WM:
Le 13/07/2024 à 21:37, Moebius a écrit :
Am 13.07.2024 um 17:56 schrieb WM:
Le 13/07/2024 à 04:38, Moebius a écrit :
Am 12.07.2024 um 19:29 schrieb WM:
> Le 10/07/2024 à 19:58, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
>> When you say that NUF(x) doesn't changeᵂᴹ at 0 you mean that
> it does not change its value from x < 0, namely NUF(0) = 0.
>
But it changes its value from aleph_0 for each and every x > 0 to 0
at x = 0,
>
That claim has been disproved. Something that is before each and every x > 0
sits at zero or at the negative real line.
As has been repeated, there is no single fixed number less than all/every
other number. However, every number has a smaller one. Do you understand
the difference?
Wie schon ein paar Mal (also ein paar 100-mal) erwähnt, scheint Mückenheim nicht fähig (oder gewillt) zu sein, zwischen
Ax Ey (y < x)
und
Ex Ay (y < x)
zu unterscheiden. Der Mann hat einen schweren Dachschaden, das steht fest.
…