Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 7/15/2024 5:09 PM, Moebius wrote:'Infinitely many' would be a better way to state this.Am 16.07.2024 um 01:57 schrieb Moebius:>
> Siehe auch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantifier_shift
Hier wird als ein Beispiel für diesen Fehlschluss angeführt:
3. Every natural number ? has a successor ? = ? + 1, the smallest of all natural numbers that are greater than ?. Therefore, there is a natural number ? that is a successor to all natural numbers.
∀? ∃? ??? ⊢ ∃? ∀? ???.
It is fallacious to conclude that there is a single natural number that is the successor of every natural number.
There are infinite successors to any finite number?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.