Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Oct 2024, 16:38:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vduata$19d4m$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 06.10.2024 15:59, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> WM <
wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
>> All unit fractions are separate points on
>> the positive real axis, but there are infinitely many for every x > 0.
>> That can only hold for definable x, not for all.
>
> Poppycock! You'll have to do better than that to provide such a
> contradiction.
It is good enough, but you can't understand.
> Hint: Skilled mathematicians have worked on trying to
> prove the inconsistency of maths, without success.
What shall that prove? Try to understand.
>> You cannot judge because you don't know that topic ....
>
> I am a graduate in maths ....
Here is not discussed what you have studied. Remember, not even infinity has been taught. Therefore you cannot judge.
>
>> .... and as fellow traveler can only parrot the words of matheologians
>> who are either too stupid to recognize or too dishonest to confess the
>> truth.
>
> .... and able to understand and follow mathematical argument,
Try only to understand my argument. ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0. How can infinitely many unit fractions appear before every x > 0?
>>> If these terms had any significance, they would still be taught in
>>> mathematics degree courses.
>
>> No, the teachers of such courses are too stupid or too dishonest.
>
> Who do you think you are to accuse others of being stupid or dishonest?
I know that I have understood that topic better than the stupids.
>
>>> Otherwise, bright students would become aware of them and catch out
>>> their teachers in inconsistencies.
>
>> They do. But every publishing is intercepted by the leading liars.
>
> <Sigh> When I was an undergraduate, students published lots of
> magazines, some of them about maths. I'm sure they still do, though they
> are likely to be online these days. The "deceit" you think happens would
> be exposed in these magazines, and thus become known,
You cannot believe that I am right, therefore you don't wish that I am right, and you try to dismiss my argument.
Regards, WM