Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : Tom (at) *nospam* bolamail.etc (Tom Bola)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 12. Oct 2024, 19:26:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <veef0q$8vu4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
Am 12.10.2024 19:49:23 WM drivels:
On 10.10.2024 21:54, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:53:07 +0200 schrieb WM:
On 10.10.2024 20:45, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
>
If all natnumbers are there and if 2n is greater than n, then the
doubled numbers do not fit into ℕ.
For any finite n greater than zero, 2n is greater than n. The same
does not hold for infinite n.
There are no infinite n = natural numbers.
Exactly! There are furthermore no infinite doubles of naturals (2n).
But the doubles are larger. Hence after doubling the set has a smaller
density
Not with the (always) Dedekind-infinite sets of *our* math on planet earth
because these sets (can) contain the required (proper) infinite subsets.
You never are reasoning within the axioms and the rules of *our* math.
What you are using is *your* total idiotic and total private bullshit.