Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 19. Oct 2024, 13:20:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vf085m$1gf6$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (FreeBSD/14.1-RELEASE-p3 (amd64))
WM <
wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
On 17.10.2024 23:22, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
If you can't understand or don't believe, then there is no common basis
for discussion.
It's not a matter of belief. It's a matter of correct and rigorous
mathematics.
When doubling natural numbers we obtain even numbers which have not been
doubled.
This is a sentence that every mathematician can understand.
It is not - it is ill formed and ambiguous. It doesn't say which
natural numbers are being doubled. It is unmathematical in that it
seems to posit a doubling being done one element at a time, rather than
the standard mathematical concept of a mapping from N -> N where n is
mapped to 2n. In this standard notion, all numbers are doubled, and we
encounter no undoubled even natural numbers.
It is true because the interval covered by the doubled numbers is
twice as large as the interval covered by the numbers to be doubled.
The interval is infinite. "Doubling" an infinite set yields a set of
the same size as the original - there is a 1-1 correspondence between
them.
Regards, WM
-- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).