Re: 2N=E

On 24.10.2024 13:43, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/24/24 6:46 AM, WM wrote:

On 23.10.2024 20:59, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 23 Oct 2024 20:03:48 +0200 schrieb WM:

On 23.10.2024 13:37, Richard Damon wrote:
>

Your complete set of the Natural Numbers is not complete.

I take what is given: the complete set of natural numbers. I double it
an get, according to mathematics 2n > n greater numbers than were given
to me.

Every single number is greater than its original, but for every number
in the mapped set there is a greater one in the former set.

>
Impossible since all have been mapped, even the greater ones.

So why can't you get the needed mapped value, since it is in the set.

It is dark and not a natural number.

Infinity isn't just some impossibly big number that twice itself is bigger than itself, that is a property of the FINITE.

That's a property of mathematics, of correct mathematics.

 You are just unable to understand the infinite, because you just refuse to let it be what it is.

The infinite must adhere to correct mathematics. Otherwise it is only matheology, to be believed by believers who despise mathematics.
Reards, WM