Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Dec 2024, 11:02:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vihc84$2ct5q$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 01.12.2024 00:34, Jim Burns wrote:
On 11/30/2024 4:56 PM, WM wrote:
Inclusion monotony prevents
an empty set of common finite cardinals without an empty endsegment.
No
It does.
E(1), E(2), E(3), ...
and
E(1), E(1)∩E(2), E(1)∩E(2)∩E(3), ...
are identical for every n and in the limit because
E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n) = E(n).
inclusion.monotony does not prevent
an empty set of common finite.ordinals
without an empty end segment.
Stupid or impudent. No reason to continue.
Regards, WM