Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 05. Dec 2024, 12:42:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vis3iq$1iu5p$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 05.12.2024 11:53, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 05 Dec 2024 09:54:11 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 04.12.2024 20:59, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
Not sure why WM thinks that Cantor Pairing does not work with any
natural number... I think I am not misunderstanding WM here.
Take any natnumber you can. Almost all natnumbers are following.
Infinitely many of them cannot be "taken" or "given" and cannot be
proven to be in any mapping. But Cantor claims that all without any
exception can be taken.
Yes, of course they can? Why shouldn't they? What does it mean to you?
 
All means all with no exception. But every number you can take belongs to a vanishing subset of ℕ.
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Nov 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)390WM
27 Nov 24 +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
27 Nov 24 i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
28 Nov 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)387Jim Burns
28 Nov 24  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)385WM
28 Nov 24  i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)377joes
28 Nov 24  ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)376WM
28 Nov 24  ii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
28 Nov 24  ii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
28 Nov 24  ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
28 Nov 24  ii i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
28 Nov 24  ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)371FromTheRafters
28 Nov 24  ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)370WM
29 Nov 24  ii   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
29 Nov 24  ii   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
29 Nov 24  ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)367FromTheRafters
29 Nov 24  ii    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)365WM
29 Nov 24  ii    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)364FromTheRafters
29 Nov 24  ii    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)363WM
29 Nov 24  ii    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)362FromTheRafters
30 Nov 24  ii    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)361WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)360FromTheRafters
30 Nov 24  ii    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)359WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10FromTheRafters
30 Nov 24  ii    i      i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6joes
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
1 Dec 24  ii    i      ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
1 Dec 24  ii    i      ii     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, infinite-middle)2Ross Finlayson
2 Dec 24  ii    i      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, infinite-middle)1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Dec 24  ii    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)348Chris M. Thomasson
2 Dec 24  ii    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)90Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)89Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)84Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)82Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)81Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)80Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)79Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)61Ben Bacarisse
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)59Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)55Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)54Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)52Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48Ben Bacarisse
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)47Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)45Ben Bacarisse
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i      +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i       +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ben Bacarisse
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)41WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19joes
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8joes
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6joes
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
8 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20Richard Damon
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        ii+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5joes
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Ben Bacarisse
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Jim Burns
2 Dec 24  ii    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
2 Dec 24  ii    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
2 Dec 24  ii    i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)253FromTheRafters
29 Nov 24  ii    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Jim Burns
28 Nov 24  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal