Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 05.12.2024 17:50, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM pretended :

On 05.12.2024 14:40, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM used his keyboard to write :

>

All means all with no exception. But every number you can take belongs to a vanishing subset of ℕ.

>
What do you mean by vanishing?

>
The subset of numbers that can be taken is ℕ_def. It is smaller than
|ℕ|/k for every k ∈ ℕ.
>
Have you meanwhile found an example for sequences with terms a_n = b_n for every n but different limit?

 Why should I?

Your answer to Identical sequences have the same limit: "Running with buffaloes does not make one a buffalo" appeared to doubt my claim.
Regards, WM