Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 16. Dec 2024, 14:59:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjpbo0$15bha$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16.12.2024 12:55, joes wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:30:18 +0100 schrieb WM:
All intervals do it because there is no n outside of all intervals [1,
n]. My proof applies all intervals.
It does not. It applies to every single finite „interval”
What element is not covered by all intervals that I use?
Regards, WM