Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 20.12.2024 12:55, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 12/20/2024 2:13 AM, WM wrote:

On 20.12.2024 03:52, Richard Damon wrote:
>

He builds an infinite sequence that pairs a natural number to every rational number .

>
And I build an infinite sequence of intervals [1, n] that contains every natural number.

 Cantor Pairing works will any of them.

Therefore no interval [1, n] and therefore no n is missing in my proof that the pairing
10n --> n, n ∈ ℕ
does not work. For every interval at least 9/10 are missing.
Regards, WM