Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 09. Jan 2025, 17:18:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vloss8$3ecjr$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 09.01.2025 10:56, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM explained :
The set {1, 2, 3, ...} is smaller by one element than the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.
Both sets are equal in size
No. Both sets appear equal (although everybody can see that they are not) when measured by an insufficient tool.
Regards, WM