Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 10. Jan 2025, 22:48:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vls4j6$7v2k$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10.01.2025 21:08, Jim Burns wrote:
Where OUR infinityⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ "doesn't work",
it's you who's saying it doesn't work,
You are inconsistent. You claim that all natural numbers are an invariable set. But when all elements are doubled then your set grows, showing it is not inc´variable. That is nonsense.
Regards, WM