Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 31.01.2025 19:34, Jim Burns wrote:

On 1/30/2025 5:32 PM, WM wrote:

ℕ holds only completely.uselessᵂᴹ numbers.
ℕ isn't what you (WM) think it is.
That's not a logic.problem.
That's a you.problem.
 

There is the assumption that a set with U(F(n)) = ℕ exists. Without changing the union we can remove every element by induction. No element remains. The set does not exist.
Regards, WM