Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Feb 2025, 12:10:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpcbam$3tpq0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 22.02.2025 11:45, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:29:26 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 19.02.2025 18:19, joes wrote:
If you think UF = X != N, then you need to accept U{} = X.
No. I don't know the relation between a FISON and X.
X is clearly an inductive set, like N.
If X is defined as the true UF (I had overlooked that), then we cannot apply
|X \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
and then U{} = X does not follow.
X is a FISON like every finite union of FISONs.
We know that although we cannot determine X.
Regards, WM