Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"

On 17.03.2025 05:23, Jim Burns wrote:

On 3/16/2025 6:22 PM, WM wrote:

On 16.03.2025 20:41, Jim Burns wrote:

On 3/16/2025 3:27 PM, WM wrote:

 

The question here is
the index of the first disappearance of Bob.

>
The answer requires you to know what 'finite' means.

>
Answer using your definition of
finite index or finite natural number.

 You misunderstand.
 I don't need to find out what 'finite' means.

Then apply your version of "finite" and answer at which finite index the first loss in lossless exchange happens.

 Do you (WM) know what 'finite' means?

Yes, it means the index is a natural number.

Whatever.
The result is the same: I can't tell you (WM).

If you can't tell me the number, then it is not existing, or your claim to know all natural numbers is wrong.

 Not 'won't', 'can't'.
I try and the answer doesn't reach you.

Simply give the number.

 Bob disappears from a superovine set ==

He disappears from the matrix. In your opinion this matrix is countable. Every exchange has an index.
Regards, WM