Sujet : Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"]
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Mar 2025, 16:28:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vrmkv7$308h$3@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
Moebius <
invalid@example.invalid> wrote:
Am 22.03.2025 um 15:44 schrieb Moebius:
Am 22.03.2025 um 15:04 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
It leaves the cardinality unchanged because this notion is tantamount
to potential infinity.
You're stuck in the 1880s.
Nope. Actually, his claim ist absurd nonsense. Es handelt sich bei WM um
einen aufmerksamkeitsheischenden, geisteskranker Spinner.
Hint: (a) Sets have /cardinality/. (b) There are no "potentially
infinite" sets. Either a set is infinite or not (i.e. finite).
Yes, very much so. The term "potentially infinite" has no use in
mathematics. Philosophers, etc., might cling to it, though.
-- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
| Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
| 12 Mar 25 |  The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 451 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 450 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 449 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 | The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 448 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 444 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 414 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 413 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 412 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | Moebius |
| 13 Mar 25 |  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | Moebius |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 401 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 399 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 397 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 393 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 392 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 7 | | FromTheRafters |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 5 | | FromTheRafters |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" (thread too long, nothing in it) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 383 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 382 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 380 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 379 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 371 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 370 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | joes |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 362 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 361 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 356 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 355 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 268 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 267 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 266 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 265 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 264 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 263 | | WM |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 262 | | Jim Burns |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 261 | | WM |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 260 | | Jim Burns |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 259 | | WM |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 258 | | Jim Burns |
| 18 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 257 | | WM |
| 18 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 256 | | Jim Burns |
| 18 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 255 | | WM |
| 19 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 254 | | Jim Burns |
| 19 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 253 | | WM |
| 19 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 252 | | Jim Burns |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 251 | | WM |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 250 | | Jim Burns |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 249 | | WM |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 248 | | Jim Burns |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 247 | | WM |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 246 | | Jim Burns |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 245 | | WM |
| 21 Mar 25 | The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 183 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 40 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 37 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 34 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 32 | | Moebius |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 29 | | Ralf Bader |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 28 | | Moebius |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 2 | | Moebius |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Moebius |
| 23 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 25 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 23 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 24 | | Jim Burns |
| 23 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 23 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 19 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 18 | | Jim Burns |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 11 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 10 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 9 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
| 26 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 6 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | FromTheRafters |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 142 | | WM |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 58 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 85 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 7 | | joes |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | Ben Bacarisse |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 29 | | Jim Burns |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 2 | | FromTheRafters |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 1 | | Jim Burns |