Sujet : Re: How? ? ?
De : dohduhdah (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (sobriquet)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 02. Apr 2025, 15:24:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vsjhb3$20ho7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Op 02/04/2025 om 15:14 schreef efji:
Le 02/04/2025 à 15:05, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 02/04/2025 à 14:49, efji a écrit :
Le 02/04/2025 à 14:32, Richard Hachel a écrit :
How can mathematicians come up with such absurdities?
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZriBHTNPw0
>
>
No mathematician would write \sqrt{i} because the symbol "\sqrt" designs the positive square root of a real number, which does not make sense in \C since it is not an ordered set and the word "positive" is a nonsense in \C.
>
Anyway, "i" has 2 square roots : ±(1+i)/\sqrt{2}
and "-i" too : ±(1-i)/\sqrt{2}
Thus, the mathematically wrong expression "\sqrt{i}+\sqrt{-i}" is non univoque and could be any of these 4 values :
>
±\sqrt{2}, ±i\sqrt{2}
>
You're welcome
>
Four possible values?
>
To think that Python gave us a nervous breakdown when I explained that a function could have multiple roots, which was actually true.
>
But here, we're falling into the opposite madness.
>
We add two numbers, and we find four answers, which is stupid, to say the least.
We don't add two numbers since \sqrt{i} is not a number because this notation is a nonsense ! Can you read carefully what I wrote ???
It seems to work just fine in wolfram alpha (desmos in complex mode gives the same answer).
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=sqrt%28i%29https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ztfet88jmu