Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 15. Jul 2024, 13:21:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <vv6K_9idTUEwX3W3ECn0Z9xK6Uk@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 14/07/2024 à 17:04, Moebius a écrit :
Am 14.07.2024 um 14:58 schrieb WM:
Le 13/07/2024 à 21:37, Moebius a écrit :
Am 13.07.2024 um 17:56 schrieb WM:
Le 13/07/2024 à 04:38, Moebius a écrit :
Am 12.07.2024 um 19:29 schrieb WM:
> Le 10/07/2024 à 19:58, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
>> When you say that
>> NUF(x) doesn't changeᵂᴹ at 0
>> you mean that
>
> it does not change its value from x < 0, namely NUF(0) = 0.
>
But it changes its value from aleph_0 for each and every x > 0 to 0 at x = 0,
>
That claim is wrong,
>
Nope.
That claim is wrong,
Nope.
That claim has been disproved. Something that is before each and every x > 0 sits at zero or at the negative real line.
Regards, WM
…