Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers

Le 07/03/2025 à 19:00, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 07/03/2025 à 13:12, Python a écrit :

Le 07/03/2025 à 13:04, Richard Hachel a écrit :
...

Nothing prevents mathematicians from proposing their ideas, nothing prevents me from proposing mine (validated in logic by AI).

 AI "validates" also that cows lay eggs.
 

Mathematicians pose i²=-1 and sqrt(i)=-1.

 They don't "pose" i^2 = -1 they *define* C and i in such a way that i^2 = -1.
 They certainly don't pretend that sqrt(i) = -1 ! Where did you get this from ?
 sqrt(i) is (1 + i)/sqrt(2) (for the principal value of sqrt).

 I obviously understand what you're saying.
 What I blame you for is unconditionally following what you've learned (I'm not saying everything is wrong, I'm not a conspiracy theorist), and never questioning a system of thought that may have flaws.
 For traditional mathematicians, it's true.
 For me, it's false.

What you claimed above is "Mathematicians pose i²=-1 and sqrt(i)=-1." was not about your "system" (which does not even exists as it is inconsistant), you wrote that some "mathematicians" would have "posed" that sqrt(i) = -1. This is factually WRONG.