Sujet : Re: how
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. May 2024, 11:43:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <y-weeuspdPzPjrZczT9yOk8IHaA@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 22/05/2024 à 01:27, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 5/21/2024 12:55 PM, WM wrote:
for any x > 0
that you can determine
more.than.any.k<ℵ₀ unit.fractions
sit before x
among them are ⅟⌊(1+sₓ/rₓ)⌋ to ⅟⌊(k+1+sₓ/rₓ)⌋
Ax_def > 0: NUF(x_def) = ℵo is right.
∀x ∈ ℝ: x > 0 ⇒ NUF(x) = ℵ₀
If there is no unit fraction smaller than all x > 0, then there is an x > 0 preventing this.
That is merciless logic.
zero unit fractions sit before any x > 0
So it is!
Therefore Ax > 0: NUF(x) = ℵo is wrong.
No. Your "therefore" is a quantifier shift.
There is no shift but merciless logic!
Your quantifiers cannot be an excuse for not understanding logic.
Zero unit fractions sit before any x > 0. What prevents this? That can only be accomplished by an x without smaller unit fractions.
Regards, WM