Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Le 09/04/2024 à 01:54, Jim Burns a écrit :Nope, because there isn't a "last" natural number, so the statement "no further one exists" isn't factual, but your false logic of using logic that only works on finite sets on an infinite set.On 4/8/2024 9:55 AM, WM wrote:Not correct if there are all natural numbers such that no further one exists below ω. Multiplication by 2 creates numbers beyond ω, or there would be numbers immune to multiplication.Le 07/04/2024 à 21:47, Jim Burns a écrit :>>The successor operation is closed in>
the natural numbers.
For visible numbers only.
Visibleᵂᴹ or darkᵂᴹ,
k is a natural number :⟺
k=0 ∨ ∃⟦0,k⦆: ∀i ∈ ⟦0,k⦆: i⁺¹ ∈ ⦅0,k⟧
Regards, WM
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.