Sujet : Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
De : d.heidorn (at) *nospam* t-online.de (Dieter Heidorn)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Apr 2024, 13:35:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <uvgiic$ipr8$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Chris M. Thomasson schrieb:
On 4/9/2024 3:47 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 4/9/2024 5:22 AM, WM wrote:
Le 09/04/2024 à 01:54, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 4/8/2024 9:55 AM, WM wrote:
Le 07/04/2024 à 21:47, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
The successor operation is closed in
the natural numbers.
>
For visible numbers only.
>
Visibleᵂᴹ or darkᵂᴹ,
k is a natural number :⟺
k=0 ∨ ∃⟦0,k⦆: ∀i ∈ ⟦0,k⦆: i⁺¹ ∈ ⦅0,k⟧
>
Not correct if there are all natural numbers such that no further one exists below ω. Multiplication by 2 creates numbers beyond ω, or there would be numbers immune to multiplication.
>
moron.
>
Are you the never ending story?
https://youtu.be/x1afn71-0sI
No, he's only the man with the never ending not understanding
that an infinite set never ends.
Dieter Heidorn
Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets