Sujet : Re: how
De : pc+usenet (at) *nospam* asdf.org (Phil Carmody)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 18. Apr 2024, 00:12:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87jzkv60u7.fsf@fatphil.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
Richard Damon <
richard@damon-family.org> writes:
On 4/8/24 9:44 AM, WM wrote:
Le 07/04/2024 à 19:56, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 4/7/24 9:23 AM, WM wrote:
>
So, With infinite sets, a proper subset CAN be the same size as
its parent.
>
Impossible.
>
Nope, PROVEN.
>
Proven impossble with my matrix,
>
Nope, since you matrix doesn't follow the required form.
>
All you have done is proven that YOUR logic can yield different
contractory results depending on which valid path you follow.
>
That means that YOUR logic system is proven INCONSISTENT, and thus
BLOWN UP.
And that is where the intrigue lies. Some might say that is has blown
up, and splattered itself all over the walls, but others might say that
it has swirled down the drain where it belongs. But, I hear you say,
it's caused a mess everywhere, it must have blown up. However,
youngling, pay attention - the gurgling, nay veritable boiling, of the
drain is WM himself deep down in that abyss, and it is he himself that
is causing the spattering you complain about.
Phil
-- We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we havegained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can castaside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/