Re: how

WM drivels bullshit, as usual:

Le 18/04/2024 à 01:26, Richard Damon a écrit :

On 4/17/24 4:30 PM, WM wrote:

 

I do not claim that ω is in the image, but it is amidst the interval.
That proves that doubled numbers surpassed it.

 

Only the ω doubled passed it. The rest stayed below ω, and no natural
number doubled isn't a natural number.

 
You are wrong. ω is amidst the interval (0, ω2) because

in the image there are as many ordinals in (ω, ω2) as in (0, ω)

LOL, idiotic again, because the image is {0,2,4,6,...,w*2,...}
under f(0)=2*o of the domain {0,1,2,3,...,w,...}
Get that already, imbecile clown.