Re: how

On 4/20/24 12:40 PM, WM wrote:

Le 20/04/2024 à 01:36, Richard Damon a écrit :
 

Nope, "counting individual numbers" NEVER gets to ω.

 Then you will never get to ω and never count a countable set. Then no set is countable.
 Regards, WM

Not with your logic, which is why it blows up when you try to use it on such systems.
You need to allow yourself to do better than needing to individually count to handle the logic of transfinite numbers.
Since you don't, you can't use any of it.
You can't say something is actually "impossible" if it is only impossible when you artificially restrict yourself from doing thing that you can actually do.
Having rejected "Mathologies", you limit yourself from that which becomes possible when you embrace the concepts they allow.
That is YOUR loss.