Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how

Moebius explained on 4/22/2024 :

Am 22.04.2024 um 23:03 schrieb Jim Burns:

On 4/22/2024 3:40 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 22.04.2024 um 21:36 schrieb Jim Burns:

>

However, deleting context courts confusion,
as you have noticed.

>
That's why I tend to use (i.e. stick to)
standard notation and common notions
(in this context). :-)

>
Since you find that that works for you,
I would not dream of asking you to do otherwise.
>
My impression of WM is he is someone who
thinks that they know what these common notions are,
and who doesn't know.

>
Yes, completely agree with you.
>

When I tried (many times) to explain to WM
common notions in common notation,
what he read is not what I wrote,
not even if I wrote it a hundred times.
So, now I try to find uncommon ways to write them.

>
Yes, I understand your motivation (I think), but -I'm sorry to say so- I don't think that you will succeed. :-)

 Ah, but it is the journey not the destination.