Sujet : Re: how
De : moebius (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 25. Apr 2024, 01:17:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0c7et$2jpq6$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 24.04.2024 um 22:36 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
I can say that, well let create a symbol... (XYZ) hold all of the natural numbers. Therefore (XYZ) + 1 is already in (XYZ), fair enough?
I have to admit that I don't know what you are talking about.
We have the symbol "IN" to denote the set of (all) natural numbers.
Now: For all n e IN: n + 1 e IN.
Is that what you mean? :-)
How about:
"I can say that, well let introduce a symbol... [that denotes the set of all natural number, say "IN".] [The set] IN hold all of the natural numbers. Therefore n + 1 (with n in IN) is already in IN, fair enough?"
?
Yeah, fair enough. :-)
Though it's not about the symbol (say "IN"), but about the set (it denotes).