Sujet : Re: how
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 26. Apr 2024, 03:04:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v0f22v$28f0q$2@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/25/24 4:17 PM, WM wrote:
Le 25/04/2024 à 01:13, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 4/24/24 1:06 PM, WM wrote:
Le 24/04/2024 à 03:50, Richard Damon a écrit :
>
But if ω - 1 existed, it would be before ω, and thus less than it.
>
It is a natnumber, but dark.
Can't be, because ALL Natural Numbers have a successor that are Natural Numbers
all visible ones.
Regards, WM
ALL
THe rule doesn't talk about "visible", that is a figment of your own mind created by you closing your eyes to things you don't want to see, so your THINK they are "dark".
The numbers aren't dark, just your eyes close.