Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how

Am 03.05.2024 16:12:28 WM drivels bullshit:
 

Le 03/05/2024 à 16:09, Tom Bola a écrit :

Am 03.05.2024 15:57:52 WM drivels bullshit:
>

Le 03/05/2024 à 11:07, Jim Burns a écrit :
>

WM call various things
"actually infinite" and "potentially.infinite".
What does he mean by those terms?
NOT "What does Cantor mean? Euclid mean?"

>
By actual infinity I mean what Cantor started but could not stand.
By actual infinity I mean what ZFC claims but cannot maintain.
>
It is the idea that infinite sets are fixed such that no element can be
added or removed.
It is the idea that the natural numbers reach immediately from 0 until ω
such that no number can be inserted between ℕ and ω. If every natural
nunmber is increased by 1, then the set is shifted from {1, 2, 3, ...} to
{2, 3, 4, ..., ω}.

>
No, nothing must be shifted - it is enough to give each element another
name like above, or e.g. "a", "b", ..., "aa", "bb", ... or whatever.

>
When 1 is added to 3, then no other name but precisely 4 is required.

 ROTFL - you idiot are so dense...