Re: how

Le 28/05/2024 à 21:42, Jim Burns a écrit :

On 5/27/2024 4:10 PM, WM wrote:
>

>
If a set of real numbers has no elements below 0,
then it ends

 Support your claim.

>
The set has ended where no elements follow.

 Feeling reallyreallyreally sure

>
The set is not where no elements are. If the set was before, then it has ended meanwhile.
>

isn't logic.
Finite sequences of not.first.false claims
are logic.

>
If your logic denies this, then your first claim is wrong already.
>
By the way: Transfinity has been published as a book. https://www.elivapress.com/en/book/book-9877032691/
>
My next book is under preparation. It will appear next year: Evidence for dark numbers. Here is the
>
Preface
>
This book contains the collection of my writings on dark numbers most of which have been published already here and there in the internet. Although I was a strong opponent of Cantor's actual infinity, an internet discussion in 2018 [1] has changed my mind in that without actual infinity the real axis would have gaps. That is my reason for accepting it and investigating its consequences.
>
Whether actually infinite sets exist is unknown and, like the existence of God, cannot be proven; it can only be assumed as an axiom. But if actually infinite sets exist then dark elements are unavoidable. Almost all elements of infinite sets are dark: They cannot be manipulated as individuals but only as sets or collections. That is the essence of this book.