Sujet : Re: how
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Jun 2024, 17:39:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <VIhO2Ae_yrPsVjSsDz1yJZy_E4g@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 14/06/2024 à 16:56, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 6/14/2024 4:34 AM, WM wrote:
Le 13/06/2024 à 20:25, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 6/13/2024 10:55 AM, WM wrote:
Every number has ℵo successors.
Yes.
No. Here is the context:
WM: If every number is subtracted, then no successors remain.
FF: Eine wirklich bemerkenswerte Erkenntnis!
WM: It contradicts your claim that every number has ℵo successors.
FF: No, WM (Proof by contradiction): Every number has ℵo successors.
If every number is subtracted the successors remain.
You:
Every number has ℵo successors.
In a proof by contradiction.
If all numbers which have ℵo successors
are deleted from ℕ,
...and
Every number has ℵo successors.
then ℵo successors remain in ℕ
...then successors which haven't ℵ₀ successors
remain in the new not.ℕ set.
That is 0 successors.
That are infinitly many successors.
Note that only the numbers with successors are deleted, the successors remain by definition.
Regards, WM