Sujet : Re: how
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 15. Jun 2024, 17:06:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4ke59$3hbdt$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 15.06.2024 um 17:58 schrieb Moebius:
Am 14.06.2024 um 20:52 schrieb Jim Burns:
(1) An e IN: card({m e IN : m > n}) = ℵo.
(2) An e IN: {m e IN : m > n} c IN.
It seems to me that WM has troubles to "comprehend" that these two statements are not contradictory (in mathematics/set theory).
Remember his claim that {2*n : n e IN} is NOT a subset of IN. <facepalm>