Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Ross Finlayson explained on 6/28/2024 :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB5RiiK0ukI&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F5_h5sSsWDQmbNGsmm97Fy5&index=18On 06/28/2024 07:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:>On 6/28/2024 6:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:>On 06/28/2024 03:25 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:>On 6/28/2024 11:21 AM, WM wrote:>Le 28/06/2024 à 19:19, joes a écrit :>Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:59:02 +0000 schrieb WM:>Le 27/06/2024 à 22:20, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :No, they both have infinitely many 9s. It does not matter how they
>There is always an infinite number of nines in Say:Is in 9.999... one 9 more than in 0.999... when 9.999... has been
9.(9) = 10
>
produced by multiplying 0.999... by 10?
Is in 9.999... one 9 more than in 0.999... when 9.999... has been
produced by adding 9 to 0.999...?
were „produced”.
Then the set of indices is not constant. Try again.
>They are the same number 10.>
Wrong. Try again.
Did you get dropped on your head at a really young age or something?
>
;^o
>
How many times do you multiply it by ten? You know, add a zero?
>
>
(.999...) * (9.999...) = (9.999...)
>
(9.999...) * 10 = (99.999...)
>
(99.999...) * 10 = (999.999...)
>
Where are the missing nines? ;^)
Oh, so you add 9's, ....
A musical term.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.