Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Jul 2024, 21:40:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5v48d$17jjv$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/1/2024 9:31 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 7/1/2024 9:10 AM, WM wrote:
Le 30/06/2024 à 20:10, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 6/30/2024 11:15 AM, WM wrote:
Le 29/06/2024 à 23:18, joes a écrit :
Am Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:01:10 +0000 schrieb WM:
>
Like "0.111..." it is a formula.
Formulas determine sequences.
The other way round is not possible.
>
Then all real numbers are formulas.
>
Yes, you got it!
>
Then there are more formulas than there are formulas.
>
Of course. All constructed finite formulas belong to a potentially infinite collection.
.6 is finite
.66 is finite
.666 is finite
.(6) is infinite
.666... = .(6) = 2/3
:^)
>
So, there is a point there.
So, there is a formula there.
But there isn't an indexed.formula there.
So, all the indexed.formulas
(finite strings, finite alphabet)
aren't all the formulas.
Somehow.
>
Yes. There is no absolute "all" in potential infinity.
>
Regards, WM
>
…