Sujet : Re: Does the number of nines increase?
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 09. Jul 2024, 01:15:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <74434c50-c747-4bce-853d-b7f8a9d0ef50@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/8/2024 3:57 PM, WM wrote:
Le 08/07/2024 à 19:33, Jim Burns a écrit :
A change needs be _with respect to_ something,
>
yes, to the value befor that point.
Yes,
for example, floor(0) with respect to floor(0-ε)
Or,
yes, to the value after that point
for example, ceiling(0) with respect to ceiling(0+ε)
Functions do not change at a point.
Functions change _near_ a point.
Consider
>
No.
A person who believes in
loss by exchange and
NUF changing at 0
_near_ 0
is not of interest to me.
Does each nonempty set S of unit.fractionsᵂᴹ
hold a largest S.element?
Does each unit.fractionᵂᴹ u (including 1)
have a next.smaller unit.fractionᵂᴹ ⅟(1+⅟u) ?
Does each unit.fractionᵂᴹ v (excluding 1)
have a next.larger unit.fractionᵂᴹ ⅟(-1+⅟v) ?
Or is what you're talking about irrelevant to
what you're saying?