Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:natural numbers: 1, 2, 3, ...
On 7/9/2024 10:30 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:You are repeating yourself. What do you mean by "more"? Can you thinkWM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:>
>Le 09/07/2024 à 14:37, Ben Bacarisse a écrit :>
>A mathematician, to whom this is a whole new topic, would start by>
asking you what you mean by "more". Without that, they could not
possibly answer you.
Good mathematicians could.
>So, what do you mean by "more" when applied to>
sets like C and R?
Proper subsets have less elements than their supersets.
Let's see if Chris is using that definition. I think he's cleverer than
you so he will probably want to be able to say that {1,2,3} has "more"
elements than {4,5}.
I was just thinking that there seems to be "more" reals than natural
numbers. Every natural number is a real, but not all reals are natural
numbers.
if a general rule -- a test maybe -- that could be applied to any two
set to find one which has more elements?
The set of evens and odds has an infinite number of elements. Just like the set of naturals.So, wrt the complex. Well... Every complex number has a x, or realSo you are using WM's definition based on subsets? That's a shame. WM
component. However, not every real has a y, or imaginary component...
>
Fair enough? Or still crap? ;^o
is not a reasonable person to agree with!
One consequence is that you can't say if the set of even numbers has
more or fewer elements than {1,3,5} because {1,3,5} is not a subset of
the even numbers, and the set of even numbers is not a subset of
{1,3,5}. They just can't be compared using your (and WM's) notion of
"more".
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.