Sujet : Re: There is a first/smallest integer (in Mückenland)
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 17. Jul 2024, 17:02:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v78pu9$1tbgs$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 17.07.2024 um 17:27 schrieb WM:
Le 17/07/2024 à 17:21, Moebius a écrit :
Am 17.07.2024 um 17:08 schrieb WM:
>
There is a point where NUF is 0
>
Yes, for all points x <= 0.
>
and then it increases.
>
No, it does not "increase", it _jumps_ "at" x = 0.
MEANING:
NUF(x) = 0 for all x e IR, x <= 0
and
NUF(x) = aleph_0 for all x e IR, x > 0 .
[NFU(x) = aleph_0] at a point x requires [aleph_0] unit fractions at that point x.
It seems that you have forgotten your OWN definition of NUF, Mückenheim.
No, it does not "require aleph_0 unit fractions at that point x" but aleph_0 unit fractions THAT ARE <= x. (Holy shit!)
Hint: NFU(x) := |{u e {1/n : n e IN} : u <= x}|
<Nonsense deleted>