Sujet : Re: There is a first/smallest integer (in Mückenland)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 17. Jul 2024, 18:49:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <Dt7UjtVV_Fl-l1XYEJYeiucc7v8@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 17/07/2024 à 19:13, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM presented the following explanation :
Le 17/07/2024 à 15:42, FromTheRafters a écrit :
Moebius presented the following explanation :
WM> All unit fractions are separated. Therefore there is a first one
>
Moebius> All integers are separated. Therefore there is a first one [?]
>
WM> This is true but difficult to understand.
Perhaps, with professional counseling,
>
you could explain how NUF(x) can increase from 0 to many more in one point although all unit fractions are separated by finite distances?
Sure, it jumps because of your stepwise function.
Og course it jumps, but what is the maximum size of a jump?
Regards, WM
…