Re: WM and end segments...

On 7/23/2024 9:49 AM, WM wrote:

Le 23/07/2024 à 10:49, Alan Mackenzie a écrit :

WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:

Le 22/07/2024 à 21:45, Alan Mackenzie a écrit :

WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:

>

Only a matheologian fixed in his views can claim that after knowing my game

>

We've known your game for years;

>

You have not understood it. Otherwise if not agreeing you could show an error. But you can only curse:

>

 it is to obfuscate, confuse, and lie.

 No comment.
 

An infinite path in an infinite binary tree can be coded as an infinite
sequence of Ls and Rs, corresponding to whether at the next node one goes
left or right.  So, for example, the very first path might be
LLLLLLLL.....

>

It is impossible to use infinite sequences of Ls or Rs. What can be used is a finite abbreviation like "LLLLLLLL.....". But there are only countably many finite

>
I have just used infinite sequences of Ls and Rs.  It's clear you do not
have a degree in mathematics.

 It is clear that you don't know mathematics. "LLLLLLLL....." is a finite expression, a formula *producing* every desired term of an infinite sequence. Infinite sequences cannot be written.

"LLLLLLLL....." is an infinite expression, indeed....
Think of: .(9) = .999... = 1 in base 10 wrt a limit. Do you think a limit makes things finite? Anyway. You would be wrong. Think of going left forever... And ever...
https://youtu.be/yPYZpwSpKmA
ROFL!!!!!! ;^)

 

Nevertheless my game shows a contradiction. Can you understand that?
The "explanation" of Andreas Blass is absolute nonsense because of the
principle of the Binary Tree. Can you understand that?

>
I'm sure I could, if I could be bothered.

 I doubt that. My students understand it within less than 5 minutes.
 Regards, WM