Sujet : Re: WM and end segments...
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 23. Jul 2024, 23:06:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7p9i3$1ck9g$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 23.07.2024 um 23:21 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 7/23/2024 1:56 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 23.07.2024 um 22:28 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 7/23/2024 1:17 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 23.07.2024 um 21:57 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 7/23/2024 9:49 AM, WM wrote:
>
"LLLLLLLL....." is a finite expression,
>
WM is right here.
>
"LLLLLLLL....." is an infinite expression, indeed....
>
Nope.
>
Hint: print(len("LLLLLLLL....."))
>
But by convention (we think -except WM that is- that) "LLLLLLLL....." DENOTES (refers to) an infinite sequence of "L"s. :-P
>
Well, I was thinking of an endless sequence of L's
>
Yes, *I JUST SAID THAT*!
>
not a literal string.
>
Sure, but THE EXPRESSION (above) is a STRING-LITERAL, isn't it?
>
A programmer really should know that! ;-P
Of course. No problem with that. I have been programming for many decades.
Same, same! :-P
I've even once written a compiler/interpreter for a VERY SMALL computer language (I called "SMALL"). So I know one or two things about parsing.
".(9)" is a string literal as well
Exatly. A FINITE "expression", just like "LLLLLLLL.....".
WM is a crank, sure, but even a blind chicken finds a corn once in a while.
WM and end segments...
Re: WM and end segments...